Drinovačko Brdo – Imotski (FB9 & FB12)

Q1. Country name:

Bosna and Hercegovina

Q2. Partner name:

Hydro-Engineering Institute of Sarajevo Faculty of Civil Engineering

Q3. Partner – Final Beneficiary No.:

FB 12

Q4. Between country – water coming from (origin country (1)) and

Croatia

Q5. Country (2) – water supplied to (delivered):

Bosna and Hercegovina

Q6. Water supply system name (English):

Water Supply System Drinovačko Brdo and Puteševica

Q7. Water supply system name (Country 1):

Vodoopskrbni sustav Drinovačko Brdo i Puteševica

Q8. Water supply system name (Country 2):

Vodoopskrbni sustav Drinovačko Brdo i Puteševica

Q9. Date/year established cross-border water supply:

14.06.2005.

Q10. Management of origin side of the WSS:

MZ Drinovačko Brdo

Q11. Management of delivery side of the WSS:

Vodovod Imotske Krajine

Q12. Amount of water supplied (as per contract/agreement):

5l/s, 50.000 m3/year

Q13. General nature of the CBWS – emergency water supply, peak water supply, permanent water supply:

Water is continuously coming into the water tank D. Brdo (volume 100 m3) and water supply from here goes with gravity flow to hundred houses of D. Brda and Puteševice.

Q14. Existing legal framework for the CBWS:

No.

Q15. Top level CBWS management body (if mutually defined):

Vodoopskrbni sustav Drinovačko Brdo i Puteševica.

Q16. Origin country reference body for the management body:

/

Q17. Delivery country reference body for the CBWS management body.

MZ Drinovačko brdo i Vodovod Imotske krajine.

Q18. Legal framework management – Contract party meetings (annual, even more frequent):

Ugovor o izvođenju radova sa JP Komunalno Grude and Ugovor o isporuci vode sa Vodovodom Imotske Krajine.

Q19. Issues addressed on the local level:

Management at the municipal level is within framework of JP Komunalno.

Q20. Issues addressed on the regional level:

Yes.

Q21. Issues addressed on the state level:

We don’t know.

Q22. Legal option to increase maximum annual entitlement?

/

Q23. Minimum amount of water delivery defined?

No, delivery is defined at 5m3/s.

Q24. Which is the body assigned by the contract for the resolution of disputes?

/

Q25. Ownership of the cross-border infrastructure:

JP Komunalno Grude and JP Imotske krajine.

Q26. Are the water rights on the water resource assigned to the cross-border partner? In which way?

No.

Q27. Termination of the water delivery of contract

/

Q28 Minimal water consumption legally defined?

No.

Q29. Is the legal heritage of the systems resolved

/

Q30. Is the water price(charge) composed by different components?

/

Q31. How is the pricing mechanism defined (water charges):

/

Q32. Are the minimal charges foreseen? – Fixed charges, full for empty:

/

Q33. Is the non-payment procedure regulated by the contract?

/

Q34. Is there a special tariff (surcharge) for the excessive water supply?

/

Q35. Insurance cost covered – insurance cost tariff, insurance model foreseen by the contract:

/

Q36. Depreciaton of the infrastructure, investment/maintenance plans agreed ? (amortizacija, ammortamento):

/

Q37. Penalties for unfulfilment of contractual obligations?

/

Q38. Is the mutual inspection of records/book-keeping established? (due dilligence approach):

/

Q39. General assessment of the CBWS economics :

/

Q40. Payment statistics for the last 5 years:

/

Q41. Other:

/

Q42. Measurement of water delivered:

/

Q43. Is continuity of water supply – intermittent water supply an issue?

No, there is no limitation in delivering water.

Q44. Agreed water quality issues:

/

Q45. Water quality monitoring jointly controlled/verified:

/

Q46. Temperature regulated by the contract?

/

Q47. Pressure regulated by the contract?

/

Q48. Cross – border profile management:

/

Q49. Construction of project facilities:

/

Q50. Is the daily dynamics of water demand/supply an issue ?

/

Q51. Is the seasonal dynamics of water demand/supply an issue ?

/

Q52. Management of water losses – are water losses in the supply, uptake side an issue?

/

Q53. Is the water availability/demand an issue on supply country or demand country side?

/

Q54. Transitional phenomena an issue?

/

Q55. Other technical issues?

/

Q56. Long term planning mechanisms established?

/

Q57. LIASON OFFICERS DETERMINED? Communication process determined and functioning?

/

Q58. Joint supervision of the Water Supply System?

/

Q59. Joint management of the water resource?

/

Q60. Contingency plans existing?

/

Q61. Main problems identified:

/

Q62. Other comments:

/

Q63. Vision:

/

Q64. Do you consider that the legal framework for the CB WSS is adequate, or under-defined:

/

Q65. Do you consider that the economic framework for the CB WS is adequate, or under-defined:

/

Q66. Do you consider that the technical framework for the CB WS is adequate, or under-defined:

/

Q67. How would you assess general perception of the cross border water supply in public?

/

Q68. Provide in the attachment shp file of the existing water supply network:

/

Q69. Provide documents on general state-level framework for the cross-border water supply:

/

Q70. Specific delivery contract:

/

Q71. Regulations, technical documentation:

/

Q72. Statistics on the water supplied and payments provided for the last five years:

/