Tomislavgrad – Imotski (FB9 & FB12)

Q1. Country name:

Bosna and Hercegovina

Q2. Partner name:

Hydro-Engineering Institut of Sarajevo Faculty of Civil Engineering

Q3. Partner – Final Beneficiary No.:

FB 12

Q4. Between country – water coming from (origin country (1)) and

Bosna and Hercegovina

Q5. Country (2) – water supplied to (delivered):

Croatia

Q6. Water supply system name (English):

Regional Water Supply System “Josip Jović”

Q7. Water supply system name (Country 1):

Regionalni vodovodni sustav “Josip Jović”

Q8. Water supply system name (Country 2):

Regionalni vodovodni sustav “Josip Jović”

Q9. Date/year established cross-border water supply:

2001.

Q10. Management of origin side of the WSS:

Vodogradnja d.o.o. Tomislavgrad (vodogradnja@tel.net.ba)

Q11. Management of delivery side of the WSS:

Vodovod Imotske krajine d.o.o. Imotski

Q12. Amount of water supplied (as per contract/agreement):

50 l/s, 500.000 m3/year

Q13. General nature of the CBWS – emergency water supply, peak water supply, permanent water supply:

Water delivery is according to contract. Ceoncession is being signed. Amount of water that can be delivered is up to 50l/s, currently is being delivered 3l/s.

Q14. Existing legal framework for the CBWS:

Yes, delivery of water is defined with contract. Currently they are waiting for cencession.

Q15. Top level CBWS management body (if mutually defined):

/

Q16. Origin country reference body for the management body:

Agencija za vodno područja Jadranskog mora

Q17. Delivery country reference body for the CBWS management body.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Q18. Legal framework management – Contract party meetings (annual, even more frequent):

Yes, there is signed contract for water supply.

Q19. Issues addressed on the local level:

Not for now. Currently is being delivered 3l/s but in contract it is defined that it can be delivered up to 50 l/s.

Q20. Issues addressed on the regional level:

Not for now. Currently is being delivered 3l/s but in contract it is defined that it can be delivered up to 50 l/s.

Q21. Issues addressed on the state level:

/

Q22. Legal option to increase maximum annual entitlement?

/

Q23. Minimum amount of water delivery defined?

/

Q24. Which is the body assigned by the contract for the resolution of disputes?

/

Q25. Ownership of the cross-border infrastructure:

Vodogradnja Tomislavgrad, vodovod Imotske krajine

Q26. Are the water rights on the water resource assigned to the cross-border partner? In which way?

/

Q27. Termination of the water delivery of contract

/

Q28 Minimal water consumption legally defined?

Yes, 50l/s.

Q29. Is the legal heritage of the systems resolved

Water supply system was built after war.

Q30. Is the water price(charge) composed by different components?

/

Q31. How is the pricing mechanism defined (water charges):

/

Q32. Are the minimal charges foreseen? – Fixed charges, full for empty:

/

Q33. Is the non-payment procedure regulated by the contract?

/

Q34. Is there a special tariff (surcharge) for the excessive water supply?

/

Q35. Insurance cost covered – insurance cost tariff, insurance model foreseen by the contract:

/

Q36. Depreciaton of the infrastructure, investment/maintenance plans agreed ? (amortizacija, ammortamento):

/

Q37. Penalties for unfulfilment of contractual obligations?

/

Q38. Is the mutual inspection of records/book-keeping established? (due dilligence approach):

/

Q39. General assessment of the CBWS economics :

/

Q40. Payment statistics for the last 5 years:

/

Q41. Other:

/

Q42. Measurement of water delivered:

/

Q43. Is continuity of water supply – intermittent water supply an issue?

/

Q44. Agreed water quality issues:

/

Q45. Water quality monitoring jointly controlled/verified:

/

Q46. Temperature regulated by the contract?

/

Q47. Pressure regulated by the contract?

/

Q48. Cross – border profile management:

/

Q49. Construction of project facilities:

/

Q50. Is the daily dynamics of water demand/supply an issue ?

/

Q51. Is the seasonal dynamics of water demand/supply an issue ?

/

Q52. Management of water losses – are water losses in the supply, uptake side an issue?

/

Q53. Is the water availability/demand an issue on supply country or demand country side?

/

Q54. Transitional phenomena an issue?

/

Q55. Other technical issues?

/

Q56. Long term planning mechanisms established?

/

Q57. LIASON OFFICERS DETERMINED? Communication process determined and functioning?

/

Q58. Joint supervision of the Water Supply System?

/

Q59. Joint management of the water resource?

/

Q60. Contingency plans existing?

/

Q61. Main problems identified:

/

Q62. Other comments:

/

Q63. Vision:

/

Q64. Do you consider that the legal framework for the CB WSS is adequate, or under-defined:

/

Q65. Do you consider that the economic framework for the CB WS is adequate, or under-defined:

/

Q66. Do you consider that the technical framework for the CB WS is adequate, or under-defined:

/

Q67. How would you assess general perception of the cross border water supply in public?

/

Q68. Provide in the attachment shp file of the existing water supply network:

/

Q69. Provide documents on general state-level framework for the cross-border water supply:

/

Q70. Specific delivery contract:

/

Q71. Regulations, technical documentation:

/

Q72. Statistics on the water supplied and payments provided for the last five years:

/